The website is in construction. New files will be uploaded as soon as they are available.

- Brief scientific biography
- His commitment to Education
- Essential bibliography
- Articles of interest for mathematics teachers
- Photo gallery

Georges de Rham was born in Roche, in the Canton Vaud, Switzerland, on 10 September 1903. After attending a secondary school specializing in classical studies in Lausanne, and though feeling inclined, since childhood, towards the arts (watercolour and drawing), and fascinated by philosophy and literature, in 1921 he entered the Faculty of Sciences at the University of Lausanne. Many years later, he said that the

"the feeling of a gap in my knowledge, the curiosity and the charm of mystery" had been responsible for this choice. After five semesters, he gave up chemistry, biology and physics to devote himself totally to mathematics. This subject, which he once used to consider
"a closed domain, where it seemed impossible to do anything new", now appeared to him as an "immense domain". With the support and advice of his "two good teachers", Gustave Dumas and Dmitry Mirimanoff, he graduated in
the autumn of 1925. In June 1931 he received his doctoral degree in Paris, with a dissertation on the topology (analysis situs) of differentiable manifolds; his interest for this topic had originated in Poincaré's memoirs, where he had run into his famous hypothesis (which he had also tried to prove), and which motivated him to move to Paris to attend the lectures delivered by Henri Lebesgue at the Collège de France.
There he would meet Élie Cartan, who was to become his thesis adviser. "The chance of my life": with these words de Rham described the moment when he came across the note by Cartan, published in 1928, which suggested a connection between the differential forms on a manifold and its topological invariants, but without giving a proof. This is the result which is nowadays known as "De Rham's Theorem", and can be formulated in terms of isomorphisms between cohomology groups. With its many consequences it marked a milestone in contemporary mathematics. Its implications reach far into modern sheaf theory, complex geometry, algebraic geometry, algebraic topology and even non-commutative differential geometry. In

physics, it is related to many aspects of modern field theory. It is the emblem of de Rham's unifying view - focused on general, abstract structures - which culminated in its theory of currents, born as an intuition inspired by electromagnetism and later developed as an extension of the distributions introduced by Laurent Schwarz in 1945. Other important contributions of de Rham's concern Riemannian manifolds, for which he gave a beautiful reducibility theorem and studied the harmonic differential forms.
His textbook Variétés différentiables, first published in 1955, was reprinted in 1960, in 1973, and translated into Russian (1956) and English (1984).
De Rham spent his whole academic career at the University of Lausanne, where he had been working as Dumas' assistant since his graduation, and at the University of Geneva: at both institutions he was appointed extraordinary professor in 1936, then became full professor and, finally, the title of emeritus professor was conferred on him when he retired, in the early seventies. He visited the University of Göttingen (1930/31), Harvard (1949/1950), the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton (1950, 1957/58) and the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in Bombay (1966). In August 1960 he gave a course at the Centro Internazionale Matematico Estivo in Saltino, near Florence.
These were his only long stays abroad; in fact he distinguished himself as a scientist devotedly attached to his country. While teaching a great number of university courses in analysis and geometry, he committed himself to promote mathematical culture in Switzerland. For many years he was editor of the journals Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici (1950/67) and L'Enseignement Mathématique (1967/78). Furthermore, he held leading positions in several national organizations: he was member of the Commission Fédérale pour l'Encouragement des Recherches Scientifiques (1950/65) and of the Conseil National Suisse de la Recherche Scientifique (1956/1969), and president of the Swiss Mathematical Society (1944/45), which awarded him the status of honorary member in 1960.
His efforts were constantly directed towards enhancing international exchange, especially in the aftermath of World War II. He succeeded in maintaining his relations with many prominent colleagues from all over Europe, whom he regularly invited to give seminars; he also supported the participation of Switzerland in the project of creation of the Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques in Bures-sur-Yvette, France.
As a recognition of de Rham's lifelong engagement, the Swiss foundation named after Marcel Benoist awarded him its annual prize in 1965 - so far, the only case where this honour has fallen upon a mathematician. Earlier he had received doctorates honoris causa from the universities of Strasbourg (1954), Grenoble (1955), Lyon (1959) and from the École Polytechnique Fédérale of Zurich (1961).
Georges de Rham was elected foreign member of the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei in Rome (1962), corresponding member of the Akademie der Naturwissenschaften in Göttingen (1974), and foreign associate member of the Académie des Sciences de l'Institut de France (1978).
In one of the hardest periods of the Cold War (1963-1966) he was president of the International Mathematical Union and, as such, member ex officio of the executive committee of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction.
On the occasion of the mathematical colloquium in honour of Georges de Rham held in Geneva in March 1969, Komaravolu Chandrasekharan writes:

"...he did as much as any one man could do to bring mathematicians together, young and old, classical and modern, from the East and West. He found a special joy in the spectacle of younger colleagues adding to the old heritage, and did as much as he could to encourage them."Georges de Rham died in Lausanne on 7 October 1990.

"For alpinism is not only a physical exercise, but it also a task for the mind, and it allows one to create a marvellous harmony between nature, soul and body."Climbing higher to attain a larger view could be considered as a metaphor for de Rham's constant attempt to advance in abstraction, to gain generality by looking at single problems and objects from above. The development set off by his first proof of the theorem bearing his name moved exactly in the direction of embracing specific questions in a more and more general framework. His scientific approach is based on the comparison of structures, which, unlike in the so-called abstract nonsense, should not be treated as empty buildings, but employed as containers that enable us to grasp different particular cases at the same time. He thus described his first encounter with this method at school:

"I remember a mathematics professor who made me understand the idea of algebra, which consists in making computations with an unknown x, and produces a great simplification in solving arithmetical problems."Clarity and conciseness in exposition were the most evident effects of this principle in his teaching, which, in his global vision of scientific culture, had to be closely intertwined with research. For him both activities required a concrete effort of interpretation, and nourished one another: the joy of discovering surprising connections between distant areas could not be detached from the joy of sharing these "nice things" with others.

Essentiality, linearity of thought and calmness made up the elegance of his lectures and seminars, where, according to Henri Cartan, he was able to "suggest a lot of things in few words." His approach to the audience was always full of benevolence and care. In de Rham's obituary in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society, Raoul Bott thus recalls the profound impression that de Rham left on him as a graduate student:

De Rham had a subtle charm which drew younger people to him immediately. In those early days at Princeton he would easily mingle with the boisterous postdocs, his exquisite manners contrasting amusingly with our rude ways."De Rham would reply that he just intended to follow the example of Gustave Dumas, who had initiated him to mathematics in Lausanne, and whom he admired for his ability in conveying his passion to others, to make them think autonomously, by "never stopping at the purely formal aspect of a question, but always seeking the deep general idea that enlightens all things from inside, from their centre." This is what he writes, in 1955, in the memorial note published in Elemente der Mathematik. Beyond this, de Rham considered moral straightness, altruism and respect as the very reasons of Dumas' success in teaching. "Never forget that you must love your pupils", was his favourite advice to his assistants. And de Rham cannot refrain from mentioning that his communication talents and human qualities were certainly rooted in his devotion to philosophy and literature. While treasuring the crucial role of teachers, at all levels, from school to university, de Rham firmly condemned the passive attitude of certain students, who only act as recipients, and are not willing to elaborate the subject by themselves (as he had been forced to do, when, at the age of fifteen, the Spanish flu epidemic had kept him away from the collège for several months). He once addressed this recommendation to a class of pupils:

"The courses, the books should only be suggestions and inspirations to work: a mathematician must judge on his own account, he must be critical and must not admit anything which he has not clearly recognized himself as well-founded."He, indeed, used to carefully verify the content of all the articles that he quoted in his papers; in his opinion, this belonged to scientific rigour and intellectual integrity, two values which he obstinately defended throughout his life.

G. DE RHAM 1980, Quelques souvenirs des années 1925-1950, Cahiers du séminaire d'histoire des mathématiques, 1, 19-36.

G. DE RHAM 1981, Œuvres mathématiques, L'Enseignement Mathématique, Université de Genève.

A. WEIL 1952, Sur les théorèmes de de Rham, Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, 26, 119-145.

H. CARTAN 1970, Les travaux de Georges de Rham sur les variétés différentiables, in A. Haefliger, R. Narasimhan (edited by) Essays on Topology and Related Topics, Mémoires dediés à Georges de Rham, Springer, Berlin, 1-11.

J. MILNOR, O. BURLET 1970, Torsion et type simple d'homotopie, in A. Haefliger, R. Narasimhan (edited by) Essays on Topology and Related Topics, Mémoires dediés è Georges de Rham, Springer, Berlin, 12-17.

J.-P. CHENAUX 1978, Un mathématicien suisse élu à l'Académie des Sciences de Paris. Georges de Rham ou la passion de la simplicité. Interview with Georges de Rham, Journal de Genève, 14 September 1978.

(AUTHOR UNKNOWN)1990, Georges de Rham 1903-1990, L'Enseignement Mathématique, II. série, 36, n. 3/4, 207-214.

R. BOTT 1991, Georges de Rham 1901-1990, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 38, n. 2, 114-115.

H. CARTAN 1992, La vie et l'œuvre de Georges de Rham, La Vie des Sciences, Comptes Rendus, série générale, 9, n. 5, 453-455.

B. ECKMANN 1992, Georges de Rham 1903-1990, Elemente der Mathematik, 47, n. 3, 118-122.

O. BURLET 2004, Souvenirs de Georges de Rham, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, http://igat.epfl.ch/igat/local/pub/derham.pdf

G. DE RHAM 1947, Un peu de mathématiques à propos d'une courbe plane, Elemente der Mathematik, 2, n. 4, 73-76.

G. DE RHAM 1947, Un peu de mathématiques à propos d'une courbe plane (suite), Elemente der Mathematik, 2, n. 5, 89-97.

G. DE RHAM 1952, Sur un théorème de Stieltjes relatif à certaines matrices, Académie Serbe des Sciences, Publications de l'Institut Mathématique, 4, 133-134.

G. DE RHAM 1955, Gustave Dumas, Elemente der Mathematik, 10, n. 6, 121-122.

G. DE RHAM 1957, Sur un exemple de fonction continue sans dérivée, L'Enseignement Mathématique, II. série, 3, 71-72.

Author

Margherita Barile

Università di Bari

barile@dm.uniba.it